The Lutheran Church in Southern Africa and its perspectives on theological education from 1900-2016
Mashabela, James Kenokeno
Lutheranism in Southern Africa was part of the missionary enterprise. The missionary enterprise
was interwoven with colonialism. It was in this context that the beginnings of the Lutheran
theological education took form. A number of phases serve as defining moments. The first phase
was the establishment of schools for the training of the evangelists and teachers. Education was
very much integral to mission. Lutheran mission societies during that period had established
evangelist schools and training teachers. The second face was to convert evangelist schools into
seminaries to improve the standard of theological education. The third phase was in 1910 when
the Co-operating Lutheran Missions (CLM) was established and prioritised to develop theological
education beyond “evangelist seminaries” in Southern Africa. This resulted with the establishment
of the Oscarsberg Lutheran Theological Seminary at eShiyane, Rorke's Drift (near Dundee) in
KwaZulu Natal. What is distinctive about this period of theological college is that the CLM had aim
to advocate for the unity of the ecumenical Lutheran missions. Yet, the Hermannsburg Mission
Society never agreed to a joint theological education transformation as it remains with the
conceptualisation of evangelist seminaries. The fourth phase happened five decades later, that
is, in 1962. EShiyane Lutheran Theological College is moved to Umphumulo Lutheran Theological
College. What makes this phase unique is that this theological college had strengthened unity
and played an important role in the process towards unity between Lutheran churches and
missions. This academic leadership college supported the vision of co-operation and the church
unity in training African pastors at the central theological education college. The fifth phase was
in 2003 when Umphumulo Lutheran Theological College merged with Pietermaritzburg Lutheran
House of Studies into the Lutheran Theological Institute (LTI), in Pietermaritzburg. In this unique
phase is that the Lutheran Church in Southern Africa is open to an ecumenical education of other
church traditions geared towards contextualisation and aims at the degree level training, which
led the road to Lutheran Theological Institute in 2003. This phase from 2003 onwards it still
unfolding to the current time. Lastly, two key aspects running throughout these phases that to this
day are not resolved are: First, the contention between full-time pastors versus self-supporting
pastors. The self-supporting pastors are pastors who receive income outside the church. Second,
it is the “poverty” state of the black pastors in the Lutheran Church. I wish you a happy and blessed
journey through a discussion and learning of this academic research study.
Bibliography: leaves 153-179
↧
The Lutheran Church in Southern Africa and its perspectives on theological education from 1900-2016
↧